| |
ANATOMY OF A RAILROAD
by
James P. Moore
On a beautiful Wednesday in July 1988, a twelve-year-old babysitter
named Sarah Cherry was abducted, tortured and strangled to death in
rural Maine. Papers found outside the house where she'd been snatched
bore the name of Dennis Dechaine. Witnesses for the State would testify
that at 8:30 that evening, they saw Dechaine emerge from a woods where,
at noon on Friday, Sarah's desecrated body would be found.
Police encountered him at 9:30p.m. and interrogated him until 4:20a.m.
Thursday.
Dechaine was anxious lest the officers detect the signs that he was
coming down off the "speed" he'd actually been doing in those woods.
Learning that he was suspected in the disappearance of a child turned
anxiety to fear. He lied - claimed he'd been fishing. But he had no
fish, nor even a fishing pole with him.
There was no forensic clue. No fingerprint or any other sign of Dechaine
at the abduction site nor the place where the body was found other than
items which had been in his unoccupied truck. No witness saw him with
the girl. But people said they'd seen his truck in the area, and then
Dechaine began babbling things like, "I don't know how I could have done
such a thing" -- words that authorities would call a confession, even
though nothing he said revealed any aspect of the crime or how it was
committed.
Two months prior to trial, defense lawyer Tom Connolly asked the court
for DNA tests on the blood under Sarah's fingernails. The state's lab
reported that blood as Type A. Dechaine's is Type O. Sarah's blood was
Type A. Prosecutors guessed the blood was "probably" from when she'd
clawed at her wounds. DNA testing would take months. The fingernails
showed no evidence of skin tissue. Prosecutor Wright argued, "While Mr.
Dechaine's body had some small scratches on them, they were not of such
significance as to have caused him to have bled." So the likelihood of
finding Dechaine's blood was "so remote, I think, as to be really nil."
Did Wright miss Connolly's thrust - that scratches on the real killer
might have caused him to bleed?
Connolly argued that, "Even if the court ultimately determines there may
be only a ten-percent chance that the tests would be exculpatory, then .
. . given the fact that there are no eyewitnesses in the case, that
there's circumstantial evidence which is persuasive but at the same time
not ultimately conclusive . . .I think the evidence should be allowed to
go forward. . .."
Wright told the judge, "What we are doing here is doing nothing more
than delaying a case which is, as the court knows, very troubling to the
community emotionally. They want it over with . . . I guess what I'm
saying here is the short delay isn't worth the gamble." Connolly cited
rape cases where the procedure had been successful and the results
admitted as evidence.
Judge Bradford ruled that, "Weighing everything in the balance here in
the light most favorable to the defendant is the possibility that the
blood under the two remaining thumbnails was the blood of someone other
than Sarah Cherry and other than Mr. Dechaine, and the possibility of
that happening is so remote that I cannot grant the motion to continue
this case. . ."
Suppressing potential proof of innocence was "viewing facts in the light
most favorable to the defendant"???
Dechaine was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. In Maine,
where there's no parole, "life" means" until you're dead."
A group spung up calling itself Trial & error - more than 400 ordinary
citizens who believed that Dechaine hadn't received justice. As a
retired federal agent, I wrote them off as just another bunch of boobs
trashing my former profession. But I listened to one of the
presentations they were making around Maine, and changed my mind. They
weren't idiots. They were naïve, but sincere. So I offered to examine
the case, fully expecting to bring them logical explanations for all
their doubts.
The elements of the case they'd questioned had little relevance. But
further investigation opened my eyes.
In every trial I've ever known, to show that death occurred at an hour
when the accused had opportunity to commit the crime, the medical
examiner tells jurors that, "the victim died between X and Y o'clock." .
In this case, however, Dr. Roy testified that, "Rigor mortis was still
present but it was broken relatively easy. In my opinion, it was passing
off." Based on that, Sarah had "been dead for thirty-to-thirty-six
hours."
Every text on forensic pathology I could get at my library, the Bowdoin
College Library, and through the inter-library loan system, confirmed
Dr. Roy's conclusion. Rigor mortis begins in the muscles of the head,
face and neck, then progresses down through the body and into the arms
and legs. It remains for a time, then dissipates in the same order until
the stiffness has disappeared altogether. Under normal circumstances,
rigor mortis leaves the body about thirty-six hours after death.
But if Sarah died thirty-six hours before Dr. Roy examined her body,
that places the earliest possible time of death at 2:00a.m. on Thursday
- at least 5 ½ hours after the state's witnesses were with Dechaine; at
least 4 ½ hours after officers began interrogating him. They kept him in
custody until 4:20a.m. After that, his time is accounted for by others.
It's true that variables can affect the progress of rigor mortis. But
every variable possible in this case -- the victim's age, ambient
temperature, and the existence of terror at the time of death - would
place her death even later than 2:00 a.m.. Nor could Sarah have been
strangled and left by her killer to a lingering death. The scarf about
her neck constricted her throat to a diameter of 2 ½ or three inches.
Ultimately, long after the trial, Connolly succeeded in getting a DNA
test. There were two blood types under Sarah's nails; neither were
Dechaine's.
Probing deeper, I uncovered facts prosecutors had concealed. More than
that part of the autopsy report indicating time of death. I encountered
resistance to disclosing legally accessible evidence. I found lies and
cover-ups. I also found a disturbing culture of indifference among
members of the legal profession - lawyers and judges, even the Bar
Overseers -- who tolerate egregious violations of their so-called
ethics.
Back when everyone was still searching for the missing Sarah, police
reports document two sets of bare footprints, one large and one small
(Sarah was barefoot when abducted) leading directly to the door of a man
investigated only weeks earlier (and later convicted) for having sex
with another 12-year-old girl; a case investigated by the same detective
leading the Sarah Cherry case. But this lead detective told his partner,
"We're losing the light" and "We'll have the wardens look into this in
the morning." Whereupon, they walked away. They didn't even knock on
that door!
Trial testimony by the lead detective and a trooper describes following
their tracking dog as it led them from Dechaine's truck and off through
the woods (probably following the track Dechaine made that day when he
went in to shoot up the speed). Both officers mentioned sounds emanating
from the spot where Sarah's body would be found on Friday - sounds they
attributed to deer. But the time of this event, stated in their official
reports, was 2:00a.m. -- the precise hour when, according to medical
examiner Roy, Sarah was being murdered. Dechaine was a quarter of a mile
away, nearing his sixth hour of questioning by other officers.
The state's case requires that Dechaine carried Sarah Cherry away in his
truck. But microscopic examination of vacuumed debris from that truck
found no fingerprint, no blood, no fabric, not a single one of Sarah's
hairs. Textbooks put the typical blonde's hair count between 80,000 and
140,000. They lose, on average, sixty-six hairs a day without being
kidnapped, wrestled into a truck, or struggling.
The police tracking dog detected no scent of Sarah in Dechaine's truck.
Dechaine had exhausted every legal avenue, so I wrote Human Sacrifice.
Copies of crucial police reports appear in its appendix. My purpose: to
inform the public, to generate letters asking Governor King* for a
pardon to end fourteen years of unjust imprisonment.
But Governor King* leaves office at the end of this year. It'll be years
before any successor musters the courage to pardon a convicted killer.
Please read the book. All evidence is documented. (Incidentally, I'm
accepting no royalties for Human Sacrifice.)
Reach your own verdict. And write - write soon. For justice!
Gov. Angus King*
#1 State House Station
Augusta, Me 04333-0001 |
|